Turmoil in Eastern Europe
The exodus of East Germans to the west continues, much to the dismay of the government, which has promised reform and issued a plea for patience of the part of the people. No attempt was made, however, to stop the flow by force. On the contrary, restrictions were eased in the hope of breaking the “emigration psychosis” that seemed to be sweeping the country.
In the East German parliament, the first non-unanimous vote in 40 years took place as Egon Krenz was elected head of state in place of the aging hard-line communist leader Erich Honecker. Demonstrations calling for free elections took place in Leipzig and other cities. Top party officials prepared policy statements calling for open elections and a market economy.
In Hungary, reforms were even more drastic as the parliament declared the nation a “republic,” eliminating the words “Socialist People’s” from the title. The Hungarian Communist Party changed its name to the Hungarian Socialist Party to give itself a more favorable image to compete in next year’s free parliamentary elections.
In Moscow, the Supreme Soviet voted to abolish the seats traditionally reserved for the Communist Party in national and local elections. Mikhail Gorbachev, on a visit to Finland, announced the removal of four submarines from the Baltic Sea and the pullback of Soviet tactical missiles out of range of northern Europe. He also said that it was not the intention of the Soviet Union to interfere in the events taking place in the Eastern bloc countries.
The urgency of these nations to change their political systems is dictated by the serious condition of the economy. The people are demanding improvements in living conditions but political reforms do not translate into economic improvement overnight. It remains to be seen whether their expectations will prove realistic.
Iranian Leaders Fan Fires of Hatred on Hostage Anniversary
Ten years ago, 52 Americans were seized in the U.S. embassy and held hostage for 444 days. On the tenth anniversary of the storming of the embassy, Iranian radicals held a demonstration to celebrate the event they call a stunning victory over “the Great Satan.” Although the government itself tried to keep the anniversary a low-key event, radical leaders ignored their efforts. For days they whipped up anti-American passions with the presentation on TV of a number of confessions by Iranians accused of spying for the CIA. The actual demonstration, however, drew a lesser crowd than in previous years. Some observers were led to conclude that, among the general population, the Islamic revolution has run its course. The:e appears to be a growing realization that the taking of the embassy was a mistake.
In the five months since the death of the Ayatollah Khomeini, the new president, Ali Akbar Rafsanjani, has been seeking to improve relations with the West. In the opinion of many observers, however, he lacks the power to challenge his hard-line opposition. Hope for an early release of the eight U.S. hostages held by pro-Iranian terrorists in Lebanon has faded along with help from the West for Iran’s failing economy. With oil revenues less than half the level of ten years ago and inflation running at 70% a year, many observers see the economy as critical to the survival of Rafsanjani’s presidency.
With the Soviet Union unable to offer much help, his only hope is for increased assistance from the West. But since the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan and the recent internal unrest in Russia, Iran’s value to the West in Middle-East strategy is greatly diminished. With the Iran-Contra scandal fresh in memory, Washington is understandably reluctant to negotiate until it becomes clear who is in charge.
More Soviet Jews may Immigrate to Israel
Now that the United States has severely restricted the number of Soviet Jews it will accept for immigration, Israel is preparing for increased numbers to go there. At the same time, it is wondering how many of those who have been turned down by the U.S. will actually go to Israel. In the past, Jews with Soviet exit visas bound for Israel could go to Vienna or some other European city and then from there apply for refugee status in the U.S. Now those who want to go to the U.S. must apply directly at the American Embassy in Moscow and refugee status will be granted to only 30,000 in 1990.
Israel is hoping that most of those wishing to leave the Soviet Union will now go to Israel. In the opinion of observers who have spent time among Soviet Jews, the numbers may not be as great as expected. They see persecution or discrimination as a secondary motive among most of those wishing to leave. The primary motive for most, they feel, is economic. They are not activists or Zionists but want to improve their economic condition and escape the privations of Soviet life. They have no interest in Israel from a religious point of view; and from the propaganda they have been hearing about Israel in the Soviet media, it is the last place many would want to go.
Israel has been trying to create a more positive image of Israel in the minds of Soviet Jews. Until recently, the Soviet media has portrayed Israel as a country constantly at war. Since Glasnost, however, they are showing a modern, prosperous and lively country which helps to break down the negative stereotype. Thousands of Soviet tourists are now visiting Israel and taking back accurate information as to conditions there.
Until recently, virtually all applicants for refugee status in the U.S. were accepted without question. Now they have to prove persecution, which most find hard to do. Those who really do want to leave will probably go to Israel or even to some other Western country where there are Jewish communities. Israel has been expecting some 100,000 immigrants over the next three years; but in the absence of more active persecution, the number may be lower.