Readers of the Signs of the Times section of The Tidings are, no doubt, quite familiar with the broad outline of prophecy It is so obvious to the Bible student that we live in the last days of history that Paul s words addressed to the Christians in Thessalonica could well apply to us today ‘But of the times and seasons brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night (1 Thess 5 1,2) However, it is well that we do not allow the apparent stalemate in the Mid East to lull us into that state of apathy which Paul warns against ‘Let us not sleep as do others, but let us watch and be sober’ (1 Thess 5 6)
Perhaps repeated reference to Mid East affairs may seem, to some, that the writers of this column have an obsession concerning prophecy in this part of the world It may be pointed out that there are other critical areas of concern on our troubled planet that require attention This is true of course, for though political and social distress is universal, the thrust of prophecy has invariably found its major focal point in the Mid East This area is the prophetic hub around which outside events revolve and world wide problems will find their solution on the basis of what takes place there So once again we will direct our attention to current events and conditions in what has been termed the most volatile trouble spot in the world—with the lowest ignition point
Understanding Bible History Helpful
An understanding of Bible history is very helpful in enabling us to see some of the cause and effect factors which complicate the Mid East problem The antipathy which exists today between Jew and Arab has its roots in ancient history
The account of this enmity is recorded in the sixteenth chapter of Genesis and arose around a conflict that took place in the family of Abraham Sarah his wife, who was childless, gave her Egyptian handmaid Hagar to her husband for a concubine that his lineage might be perpetuated The son that was born to Hagar was named Ishmael and was the apparent heir until fourteen years later when Sarah herself became the mother of a son whom Abraham named Isaac. This was the true heir, by God’s promise, and because of the resentment and hostility of Sarah toward Hagar and Ishmael they were expelled from the family circle. This animosity has continued throughout history and exists in a particularly aggravated form today.
Ishmael grew up a true son of the desert, impatient of restraint and overbearing in his temper. The treatment he had received in the family of Abraham and the necessity of earning a precarious living by his sword and bow would naturally wound his proud spirit and make him what the angel predicted, “A wild man; his hand will be against every man and every man’s hand against him.” (Genesis 16:12) Such was the progenitor of the Arab races and we wonder as we trace their history if his temperamental characteristics have not been transmitted from generation to generation.
A very interesting observation comes to mind as we read the Bible record concerning Ishmael. His mother was an Egyptian and when they dwelt in Paran she “took him a wife out of the land of Egypt (Genesis 21 :21) . We have no account of Ishmael having any other wife, and if this be the case, she was the mother of twelve sons and one daughter. This half Egyptian daughter, Mahalath, had her part, as we shall see in the development of the kinship of the desert tribes. Under this circumstance the Arab nations had their origin in a Semitic father and an Hamitic mother. We wonder if the compatibility which seems to exist in the present Arab-Egyptian detente is not prophetically indicated in this blood relationship?
Esau Marries his Cousin
The narrative concerning Esau and Jacob is remarkably similar in its divisive result. A bitterly disappointed Esau, deprived of his birthright, leaves his home and family to take up his abode in Mt. Seir (which is part of present day Jordan). He is strikingly like his uncle Ishmael in disposition and temperament “a cunning hunter, a man of the field” (Genesis 25:27), who was delighted to roam the wilderness and was impatient with the restraints of a settled life. When Esau heard that his father had commanded Jacob to take a wife of his kinsman Laban, he also resolved to try by a new alliance to appease his parents. He accordingly married his cousin Mahalath, the daughter of Ishmael (Genesis 28:69). Here once more we see how a seemingly unimportant episode such as the introduction of an Egyptian blood line into the house of Edom may have a significant prophetic connotation in relation to the present Arab-Egyptian alliance. Blood is thicker than water, particularly to the Arabs.
The Arab-Egyptian confederation has its elements of strength but it also has its weakness as well. Its strength lies in its religious solidarity and particularly in the unity of its mutual hate for Israel. Its weakness is the suspicion and distrust that exists among its members and the lack of organization and discipline within its own ranks. Is this a latter day depiction of the temperamental and unstable characteristics of Ishmael and Esau? Let us take a look at the Mid East and see if conditions support this approach.
Some excerpts from the current news media will be helpful by giving us an insight into the problems that exist in the Mid East, particularly those that relate to the Moslem world. An article in Newsweek points out that “When Henry Kissinger’s efforts to negotiate an interim agreement between Egypt and Israel collapsed last March, the Arab States were widely expected to close ranks and begin to prepare for a fifth Middle East war. Part of this scenario has come true. The Arab countries have settled many of their old differences in recent weeks and achieved an unprecedented degree of unity. But far from uniting for war, an unexpected consensus has developed in the Arab world that the wiser course might be to negotiate a Mid East settlement with Israel. The sole holdouts have been the last remnants of the so called “Rejection Front”, the most militant members of the Palestine Liberation Organization, and Libya’s fanatically anti-Zionist leader Muammar Kaddafi. Last week the P.L.O. and Kaddafi were the odd men out in the Arab camp, but that did not deter them from trying everything—up to and including a plot to assassinate Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat—in their desperate determination to block a new step toward peace”.
“Egyptian intelligence officials told Newsweek that, in an extraordinary meeting, Kaddafi offered Habash, the radical Palestinian leader 5 million dinars (16 million dollars) to kill Anwar Sadat. Habash, the sources said, readily accepted the “contract” on the Egyptian President, and boasted: If we can penetrate the heart of Tel-Aviv, you can imagine how much easier it will be in Cairo or Alexandria.” That this was no idle threat was confirmed on July 4th when a bomb exploded in the center of Jerusalem, killing 13 persons and injuring 72 others. The Palestinian Liberation Organization, Ha-bash’s guerrilla group, issued a communique in Beirut claiming responsibility for the bombing. The P.L.O. statement said the bombing showed it can strike at will into any part of Israel This heroic operation in the heart of Jerusalem proves anew the ability of our revolutionaries to fight the Zionist enemy at any time and any place the statement said Of course there will be reprisals Israel, in the past, has always moved swiftly to retaliate, generally against the PL0 centers in Lebanon This action increases the tension throughout the Moslem world and complicates the efforts toward a peaceful settlement of Mid East affairs This is exactly what the radical groups want, for it is their declared objective to scuttle all attempts to recognize the validity of Israel s statehood
Problems of Peace Compounded
Let us look at a few of the factors which compound the problem of peace in the Mid East Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in a press interview was asked how strong Russia s influence was in the Arab world He answered It is not evident to me, in contrast to our own position, that the Soviet Union has improved its position in the Middle East in the last two years The opposite seems to me to be the case To a follow up question Can you count on any help from the Russians in promoting a settlement, or are they mainly interested in perpetuating a conflict which they can exploit ? Mr Kissinger answered On the one hand you can argue they like the tension in the area because it creates a chance for enhanced influence On the other hand It can be argued that tensions which force a country to take positions which it then cannot implement do not in the long run, enhance its influence
So I would think that, as the result of events of recent years, the Soviet Union would come to the view that it is running risks disproportionate to what it is getting out of it And if that is true, perhaps conditions for a more con structure relationship will develop Certainly in recent months the Soviet Union has not been as aggressive about the Middle East as it might have been
Mr Kissinger s views, however, do not seem to be echoed by a number of the members of the press Marquis Child’s, an experienced columnist writes Thanks to massive help from oil rich Arab neighbors, Egyptian military strength is nearly back to the point at which Sadat initiated the war that began nearly two years ago
The build up owes little to the Soviet Union, since all the evidence indicates the Russians would like to bring Sadat down He is, in turn, taking unannounced steps to curtail what remains of their presence since 1972, when he ordered out 20,000 Russian technicians and soldiers
The Soviets are doing their best to encourage the hostility of certain of Egypt s neighbors notably Libya With terms greatly exaggerated in the press, Moscow has concluded a deal with Libya s inflammatory dictator Maummar Kadiffi This calls for military help of one billion dollars over a period of years The Libyan radio, meanwhile, spews out hate broadcasts against Sadat Newsweek comment mg on this same situation notes that while Libya had signed a pact with the Kremlin to buy modern Soviet arms, this would hardly be a serious threat to Egypt Some Cairo officials however, viewed the move as foreshadowing a campaign of subversion and sabotage Accordingly, Egypt shifted a number of army units from the Israeli front to the Libyan border
We conclude our article with one more commentary Britain was looked upon, in times past, by many students of prophecy as the latter day friend and protector of the Jew Subsequent events have proved how far this viewpoint was astray An Associated Press report from London confirms this as we read Britain and France, hungry for petroleum dollars, have entered into secret commitments to help make Egypt the arsenal of the Arab world
Senior officials of Britain, France and Egypt said that their governments are now in the final phase of negotiating a series of interlocking multi billion dollar transactions for the supply of plants and technology, as well as weapons, to Egypt
The informants disclosed the broad outlines of a two-stage program. In the first stage, Britain and France will supply Egypt with a wide range of war material, including 200 trainer and light attack planes, at least 250 helicopters, anti-tank guided missiles, light tanks, armored cars, communication systems and radar gear. The British expect to earn more than a billion dollars from this transaction and the French nearly as much.
In the second stage, Britain and France separately, and in some cases jointly through merged British and French firms will provide the plants, technicians and capital equipment for the Egyptians initially to assemble and later to manufacture helicopters, tanks, missiles, and other weapons. British and French earnings for equipment, technology, licensing and patent rights could run into the billions of dollars.
Arabs Unstable
We see, in summation, that in spite of some claim for unity within the Arab league, much that indicates the characteristic instability of their forebears, Ishmael and Esau. The disorganization that exists in the Arab world brings to mind the many occasions in the Scriptures when God frustrated the enemies of Israel by creating disorder and chaos within their ranks. An example relevant to our article is the invasion of Israel by the early ancestors of the Arabs, the Ishmaelites. Gideon, with God’s help, in a night attack caused such confusion in their camp that “the Lord set every man’s sword against his fellow” (Judges 7:22).
While the attitude and actions of Israel leave much to be desired, they are still God’s people with a future in the Holyland. There is assurance in the words of the Psalm “He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber. Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. (Psalm 121:3,4) There is a warning in the Scriptures also, for Zechariah prophecies “Thus saith the Lord . . . he that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye.” (Zechariah 2:8)
Israel must go once again into the furnace of affliction. This time it will be for refining, to purge away forever the dross that has adulterated their relationship with their God, “And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say it is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God” (Zechariah 13:9).
The Arabs too must recognize the root from which they sprang—the God of Abraham and Isaac. In that great day soon to come they will repudiate their false prophet Mohammed and accept the true prophet„ Jesus Christ the Son of God.
Then, and not until then, shall the age old conflict cease between the sons of Ishmael and Isaac, and the children of Israel be at peace with the descendants of Esau.