Due to a variety of circumstances, we misinterpreted information regarding the reaction of the Bucks County, PA and Moorestown, NJ ecclesias in respect to the exchange of letters between the Echo Lake, NJ and Lancaster, PA ecclesias. The Bucks County
Ecclesia has written the following letter clarifying their position. Similar sentiments were verbally conveyed by Bro. Bob Faust, Recording Brother of the Moorestown Ecclesia. Our sincere apologies for our misstatement.
Dear Bro. Don,
Greetings in Our Master’s Name.
This letter is to correct the report on page 434 in the October issue concerning the position of the Bucks County Ecclesia regarding the action of the Echo Lake Ecclesia.
Our first full review of the letters appearing in the magazine’s October issue did not occur until Monday, October 2, one week after the publication date of the magazine. Our Arranging Board and membership have, as yet, stated no position on the developments described in the published letters. On October 16, we have sent a letter of inquiry to the Echo Lake Ecclesia requesting additional information.
Please share this correction with the magazine’s readership.
The Arranging Board of the Bucks County Christadelphian Ecclesia (Signed by Bre. Kevin Flatley, Charles Link, Jr., Daniel Phillips, Howard Schlicher, Sr.,
Paul Schlicher, William Septak.)
A number of events have occurred during recent months that cannot be coincidental. Surely the Lord is at work giving us opportunity to more faithfully serve the principle of the one body while preserving the one faith. We need to vigorously pursue this opportunity that we might realize in North America the blessings, already experienced elsewhere in the world, of a more unified community of believers.
Carnivores before the Flood
Dear Bro. Don,
I believe Bro. Martin Owen’s view (that there were no carnivores before the flood, pg. 340) is more in harmony with the scriptures. The first chapter of Genesis is the story of an almost perfect creation. It was “very good.” Genesis 1:30 was part of this “very good” creation; this was before Adam and Eve ate of the tree in the garden.
It would appear that no creature ate meat until after the flood. (We are not, however, told what was done with Abel’s sacrifices.) Even though God must have killed animals for the skins of Adam and Eve’s ‘covering,’ there is no indication they ate it.
The Lord God planted a garden for food and put Adam in it to till it and keep it. It was his for food, except for the tree of knowledge of good and evil. It is certainly not impossible for God to change the nature of an animal. Had some of them been created carnivorous, the creation would not have been “very good.”
I feel that Bro. Alan Hayward’s explanation (pg. 286) puts human scientific limits on the power of God, but I am sure that was not his intention.
J. Binch, Telford, PA
As we do so on a regional and local basis, however, we should realize we are in uncharted waters having no precedents to guide ecclesial actions. In such circumstances, we are even more exposed than normal to misunderstandings. We suggest such problems can be minimized if ecclesias in a given area keep each other reasonably well informed of developing situations.
Colors in the Bible
Dear Bro. Don,
Regarding an article on pg. 420 (10/95) on “Colors used in the Bible and their Significance,” I submit the following further observations.
The plan of God for man is in the rainbow —
Red – Hebrew adam, the old man of the flesh.
Orange – the color of fire, a symbol of trial and temptation.
Yellow – the color of gold, a symbol of tried faith.
Green – the color of new life, a symbol of immortality.
Blue – the color of heaven, a symbol of divine love.
Purple – the color of royalty, a symbol of kings and priests.
Whether Noah understood this symbolism as he looked upon the first rainbow, we do not know, but the outline of God’s merciful plan for man is there in Bible symbolism. May we each attain the radiance of the gold of a tried faith in this life.