Preaching Opportunities

Dear Bro. Editor,

We endorse and thank you for your editorial (“No Visitors”) which appeared in the November issue of the “Tidings.” It is good to remind us about the need for preaching and offer suggestions, both new and old. Do it again whenever you can.

Our organization (Mid Atlantic ASK) has been doing some preaching work on Staten Island, NY for the last few years. There are no Christadelphians living there and to reach Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens or ecclesias in New Jersey requires paying tolls. This can be a road block to encouraging contacts to join Bible classes at those various ecclesias. It would be very advantageous if a Christadelphian couple could move to Staten Island and open their home to Bible classes. It has some pretty neighborhoods with trees, grass and a suburban look. Any who are planning to move to the New York area might like to include Staten Island on their list of possible places to live. Their help would be greatly appreciated.

Your sister in Christ,
June Renshaw, Sec.
1805 Tunis Rd.
Silver Spring, MD 20903

1993 Youth Conference

Dear Bro. Don,

I just wanted to write a short note to encourage those planning to attend Manitoulin Youth Conference in 1993.  The study for this year is “Prepare to Meet Thy God -The Prophecy of Amos.”

I was very disappointed when I first heard we were going to study Amos. In fact,I thought it was going to be a total flop and I did my best to encourage those involved to change their minds and study something else.

Now I’m halfway through the workbook(thanks to getting an advance copy) and!’ m totally thrilled with the study. I try to do an hour a day. Every time I sit down, I find something new that makes me rethink my spiritual position. I see anew what God hates to see in us and what He really is looking for in our lives.

It is remarkable how much the society in which Amos lived was like our own, even in the ecclesial world, and how much we need to “shape up” before that great day of our Lord comes.

One of the biggest things that has struck me is that we profess to be followers of God, yet many of us find even one hour a day too much to study God’s word. Trying to prepare for our Lord’s return and serve him without personal Bible study every day is like trying to compete in the decathlon while fasting — it’ s impossible to succeed. This is true for sisters as well as brethren.

It’s amazing how daily study of the Word of God changes our perspectives in life and gives us the energy to do what is right. The people in Amos’ time were caught up in doing the ritualistic worship (just going to meeting, Bible class, CYC) but it was not affecting their hearts. They were just sitting there hoping it would soon be over so they could get back to their materialistic way of life.

Let’s get into the Word that it might help us “Prepare to Meet our God!”

A Sister in Christ

Back Issues

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings in our bonds of love and hope in Christ Jesus.

Great work with the “Tidings” magazine. It is indeed refreshing to read articles pertaining to the Truth from a North American perspective. Many thanks to you and all who contribute to this fine magazine.

Since my baptism in 1983,  I have come to realize the great storehouse of knowledge in Christadelphian periodicals. As our ecclesia is rather small, past issues of these magazines are few and far between.

Surely there must be brothers and sisters who have back issues of “The Christadelphian,” “The Testimony” or other Christadelphian magazines that they no longer use. I am prepared to pay for the magazines.

Anyone able to help could contact me by FAX at 1(403)451-3066 or at 12255 Dovercourt Ave., Edmonton, ALBT, Canada T5L 4E1. FAX letters should be addressed to myself and include my home phone number of 453-1412.

I am particularly interested in years 1975-1980 for the “Christadelphian” and all issues before 1970 for both the “Christadelphian” and the “Testimony.”

Sincerely your brother,
Jerome Toronchuk

An inquiry was also received respecting past issues of the “Tidings.” We only have back issues for 1989­-1992. They are available for $.50 each from the “Tidings” address.

Letters With Payments

Along with subscription payments, we receive many encouraging notes for which we are most grateful. Following is a sample.

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings in the one hope.

Hard to believe 1993 is almost upon us. Can there be many days left until our Lord’s return? The world seems so unstable — the world’s economy in tatters, turmoil in the Middle East and uncertainty in Russia to name but a few problems.

The irony is that, for the most part, people go on with their lives as if nothing is wrong. The world of sports, for one, seems to go by the philosophy of “Tomorrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant,” (Isa. 56 : 12 )with their $7 million a year players, free agents and expansion ($50 million for a hockey franchise!?).

We enjoy the “Tidings” and it is a great help in our household. May God continue to bless your hard work. Give our love to Sis. Ellen and the family.

Love in Christ,
Chris Sales, Shelburne, ONT

Appreciating the “Messiah”

Dear Editor,

What a joyous and beautiful part of the year we have just passed through. It is characterized by happiness, love and the great atmosphere of giving with thankful hearts that we are able to give.

On a yearly basis, the Toronto Symphony and Toronto Mendelssohn Choir, with the aid of their sponsors, puts on a spectacular performance of Handel’ s Messiah. This year was by no means any exception. This is a beautiful and breathtaking piece of music with words of powerful meaning. They are words of joy, yet so few people seem to grasp the eternal meaning of this sacred theme. God has made great promises to mankind; who will respond?

The golden thread that George Frederic Handel wove through this ora­torio, based on God’s word, is astounding! He starts with God’s chosen people and the realization that Christ is Messiah to all nations and then Handel goes forward to unfold the history of that amazing birth of Jesus through a virgin and includes the name that should be upon all lips — Emmanuel!

The picture continues to be painted. Handel shows how Gentiles shall be called by the power of faith in God, through Messiah. But who is Messiah? He is the Son of God and he is to be given all power by his Heavenly Father. He will rule the earth and joy and peace will be present.

We can imagine the sound of the heavenly host singing those well known words, “Glory to God in the highest, and peace on earth, good will towards men” (Lk. 2:14).

Even today, we have not witnessed the fulfillment of these words. When will we? Christ made it clear that, if we follow him and do his Father’s commandments, we will be with him at the time when God establishes His kingdom on earth.

Handel then draws from scriptures which narrate how Christ suffered greatly in his courageous and moving will to serve his Father. He did so that he might overcome his sinful nature, putting God first, not man. He died that we may have away to approach God. Though like us, Christ did not sin; he was a lamb led to the slaughter.

As promised, for the grave could not hold a perfect man, Christ rose the third day. What a glorious day! How can we ever thank God for His mercy in providing His only begotten son for our sakes? We cannot earn salvation; but, through God’s grace, it will be granted to those who recognize their need and desire eternal life with our Lord.

With his Father’s mighty power, Christ will raise the dead and bring them, with the responsible among the living, before him for judgment. Christ, the King and Redeemer, will bring into being that great time when all will acknowledge that the Lord God Omnipotent reigns.

“Blessing and honor, glory, and power be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb, for ever and ever, Amen.”

Yours sincerely,
D.S. Hayles, Scarborough, ONT

Abrahamic Faith

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings in the Lord.

I was most interested in the account by Mark Drabenstott of the history of the Church of God of the Abrahamic Covenant, and especially of his account of the involvement of Benjamin Wilson. It is not often realized how close was the relationship between Benjamin and the Christadelphians, as I discovered when doing research for the centennial of the Meriden, CT Ecclesia. The account given by Bro. Christmas Evans in the “Christadelphian” (One Hundred Years Ago #32) includes a letter written to Dr. Thomas by Benjamin in 1846 concurring with Dr. . Thomas’ beliefs. The same article confirms that Dr. Thomas bap­tized Benjamin in 1856, although apparently they had never previously met; the relationship was by correspondence.

Of more interest to the debate on the doctrinal views that separate us is the information that Benjamin Wilson maintained some contact with the Christadelphians all his life. Correspondence in the “Fraternal Visitor,” the magazine of the Suffolk Street Christadelphians, records exhortations given by “Bro. Benjamin Wilson of the Emphatic Diaglott in September, 1891 at the Oakland, CA Ecclesia. His death is recorded in 1900 in the following terms, “…in Sacramento, a few months back…he never permanently identified himself as a Christadelphian, because of immortal emergence…met and broke bread with us only a few months before his death.”

It is clear that a hundred years ago, Benjamin Wilson realized the essential similarity of beliefs between himself and the Christadelphians, but he also recognized that the disagreement on immortal emergence was important enough to separate him from true fellowship.

Your brother in Christ,
Peter Hemingray, Farmington, CT

Dear Editor,

I am writing in response to Mark Drabenstott’s article regarding the his­tory of the CGAF.

Drabenstott’ s article generally follows the outline of Church of God his­tory as misrepresented by the Wilson’s, who slighted Joseph Marsh and ignored the role of the Age to Come Adventists, who made up the first generation of the Church of God.

The Age to Come Adventists (pre-millennial ex-Millerites who proclaimed the restoration of national Israel, most of whom looked to the ex-Millerite, Joseph Marsh for direction), had already organized themselves into loosely-connected congregations using the term “Church of God” before the arrival of the Wilsons. Benjamin Wilson was not the founder of the Church of God. The Wilson’s naturally merged with the Age to Come Adventists because of doctrinal similarities and rapidly became prominent leaders within the movement, but they were not its only representatives. Adventist Historian David Arthur has put it this way:

“In Illinois, it would seem that the ‘age to come’ position was supported and maintained by those whose origins lay in English Adventism rather than in American Millerism. Wilson maintained a small publishing house in Geneva, Illinois and his activities seem to have been the center around which the Illi­nois group revolved.

“At this point a further word about the English Adventists is in order. Arriving in the late 1840’s, originally they settled in the middle Atlantic states with their center in Philadelphia. Their views differed from those of Miller in their belief that the Jewish nation must be restored to Palestine prior to the second advent of Christ…”

I sympathize with Drabenstott’s feelings about the members of the Ministerial Association for various reasons, but the doctrines of universal resurrection and open communion were not first introduced by them. These Biblical doctrines were well understood by many nineteenth century Church of God congregations and were taught by the pioneer of Age to Come Adventism, Joseph Marsh. (Interestingly, Church of God historian David Graham has pointed out to me that Benjamin Wilson originally believed in universal resurrection.) In addition, Marsh and other early Church of God brethren also believed in a supernatural devil.

These doctrines are not late innovations, but have been propagated among us from the first. At the same time, it is equally true that “Thomasites,” like the Wilsons and Hug gins, were a significant part of our movement, and had a much more narrow view of fellowship. As Drabenstott indicates, when we finally managed to reorganize, some congregations in Florida, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio refused to participate because of our greater tolerance for doctrinal diversity.

Yes, I suppose it is true that there is no fellowship between the General Conference (to which I belong) and the churches with which Drabenstott is affiliated, or between us and the Chris­tadelphians. It is very unfortunate that you people should have such a sectarian attitude.

Sincerely,
Mark M. Mattison, Wyoming, MI

Dear Editor,

About 35 years ago ,when we lived in Corpus Christi, TX, I advertised in the paper for anyone being or knowing a Christadelphian (my husband was not in the Truth then). I had two answers to my ad.

First, I received a manila envelope from a lady with literature about the CGAF , comparing it to the Christadel­phians. It explained that the only difference in the two beliefs was about the question of whether or not the worthy are raised immortal or mortal. Up to that point, I had never heard of the CGAF.

We arranged to meet and then we decided to study together, not mentioning our one difference but studying about what we believed alike. The children and I met with her in Alice, TX every Sunday for several years. When her husband died, she moved away.

She was a Christian woman and a wonderful person. Her name was Betty Thibault. My address is below so that she can get in touch with me if she happens to read this.

The second answer came from a prisoner who was in an Arkansas prison for being an habitual criminal. His mother had been a Christadelphian but he would never tell us her name. Betty and I bought him a Bible and sent him Christadelphian literature. The last I heard, he was out of prison but! have lost touch with him. You can imagine how much I enjoyed the article “Finding the Truth in Prison” in the November “Tidings.”

Your sister in the Truth,
Edith Scott Rt.
2 610 Nancy Dr.
Glen Rose, TX 76043

Ecclesial Politics

To My Bro. Don Styles,

Politics is compromise, of that, there is no doubt. Acts 15, as you point out, records an example of this at work.

Christ’s teaching about the Mosaic Law being fulfilled was ignored by the Jewish believers. As we see, Paul had to step in and arrange a compromise of the Truth which only lasted, as you also point out, for a short time.

You call agreement to this compromise of the Truth a “lovely spirit.” I call it the fleshly mind putting the skids to the Truth that Christ taught and Paul had little or no choice but to go along.

The dictionary says compromise is a combination of two rival systems in which a part of each is sacrificed to make the combination of the two systems possible. This is nothing less than men’s way of watering down the Truth to suit themselves. And you call this a “lovely spirit” between these two factions? I call it what it was, the flesh, as usual, getting in the way of the Truth.

Proof of this is in the history of what took place in less than 50 years. The Truth was overwhelmed and was all but obscured by 300 A.D. Christ’s words to John in Revelation confirm this.

There is a lesson to us indeed in Acts 15 and it is not to resort to the politics of compromise; that should be avoided, not condoned as a “lovely spirit” among us. I know that man cannot live in the flesh without compromise of some sort, but please do not call it a “lovely spirit.” …There will be no compromises with the Truth when Christ is ruling.

The “flesh” is very deceitful and at times hard to recognize…Are we not to be of Christ and not of the flesh? Compromise is of the flesh. The spirit of truth does not compromise with the flesh; rather it wars against it. These days are evil ones, let us recognize it.

Spanish Material Needed

Dear Brethren and Sisters in the faith, Sincere best wishes for a happy 1993 to you and your ecclesia.

Some good news. As of December 17, 1992, our radio program, “The Christadelphian Message” is being broadcast from 10 to 12 P.M. every Thursday evening. I would greatly appreciate any Bible literature in Spanish. We would also appreciate cassettes of Christadelphian hymns (music only) to be used as background music during the program.

I join with you in prayer to our Heavenly Father for the soon return of our Lord Jesus.

With fraternal greetings,
Hugo A. Petrilli
C.C. 5- SUC.18
2000 Rosario
PCIA. Santa Fe,
Argentina

Destruction of Environment

Dear Don,

Thanks again for your splendid January editorial and the clear leadership it conveys. I look forward to the “Tidings” these days with eager anticipation.

As you will observe , I am presently in Queensland on the last lap of my US-funded rain forest assessment. By and large, the conclusion is sad, and even depressing, but a Biblically derived knowledge of human nature has steeled us for such findings, and our hope lifts up our heads. Here in Australia, cancer is now epidemic within the brotherhood as much as outside, with virtually every family affected. The states demand that schoolchildren now wear headgear at all times outside, and UV alerts and ozone hole advisories are part of every daily weather report. The prevalence of childhood leukemia is scary.

I have found the ecclesial situation here continues to be increasingly invested with brotherly love rather than bitterness, and that is most encouraging.

Yesterday I was a visitor (unannounced) at the Townsville, Queensland Ecclesia. I had been warned beforehand by members of the Petrie Terrace Ecclesia in Brisbane, Queensland 1800 kilometers away that I would be made to sign a paper on fellowship before being admitted inside the hall, and that they (of Petrie Terrace) would never be allowed at that meeting. So! did not know what to expect. In the event, I was given by the doorkeeper a tastefully printed card welcoming me, and pointing out in the most brotherly of language that the ecclesia meets on the basis of Bible truth of which the BASF is “a statement” –a gesture and wording that no sincere brother or sister could possibly take offense at. And I spent the rest of a happy day with a young couple who had transferred there from Petrie Terrace! So much for the dire warnings.

I was most of a week in Singapore, and spent a wonderfully uplifting Sunday in their company. A happy, dynamic ecclesia if ever there was one.

With love, as always,
By grace,
Alan Eyre, Free Hill, Jamaica, visiting Australia

Help in Despair

Dear Bro. Styles,

Greetings in the name of the Lord. I must tell you a little story that happened to me today.

I had been distressed. I could not sleep, and worst of all,! could not pray. Thoughts kept creeping in disturbing my prayers. I kept asking God for peace of mind.

We had lost our daughter to cancer. Her husband didn’t want any of our family near her. He wanted her all to himself. We did go to England twice during her illness whether he liked it or not. She was unfortunately not in the Truth. There was a lot of bitterness and hurt; it was unbelievable that anyone could behave like he did. It has been like going through a dark tunnel.

Last night, I was awake until the early hours of the morning. As we do every morning, my husband and I did the readings. Today, while we were reading Psalm 23, I felt peace; when we got to Psalm 25, my anguish left me. I felt a calm as if the Lord was giving me peace of mind.

I have to forgive my daughter’s husband although this is very hard. I have been told to write a letter to him, let my anger out, and burn it. I feel after that, if he wrote and said he was sorry,! could forgive him.

How we must say we are sorry to our Lord and ask for his forgiveness. I know the Lord answers prayers. He did it when my husband had a bad heart attack.

Now, when! couldn’t pray, I was grieved. I prayed for peace of mind; I got it. The feeling I got was like the tension going from me out of my head; and by the time we had finished the readings, I felt at peace.

What wonderful gifts we have if only we will use them properly– the power of prayer, comfort from reading the Bible and the companionship of our brothers and sisters. If only brothers and sisters realized what they are missing when they stay away from the meetings for long periods. If there should be anyone who does this for any reason,I appeal to you to ask God for His forgiveness and come back to the fold; you will be welcomed. Remember the lost sheep. Do not miss the chance of being in the kingdom where we will have no stress, sorrow or crying. Do not let this chance go.

Your sister in Christ,
M.B., ONT

Children’s Names

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings in our Master’s name.

Over the past few months, I’ve seen many reports of newborns to parents in various ecclesias. What! would like to know is why don’t parents give their babies biblical names? There are so many to choose from: Aaron, Abigail, David, Mary, etc. Why give two non-Bible names when there are so many names in the Bible? I feel that parents who wish to name their children after themselves or some ancestor should include at least one name from the Bible.

In Luke 1, Elizabeth gave birth to a son and his name was called “John” which means, “whom Jehovah loves.” The angel of God chose this name be­cause it had spiritual significance. That is a great advantage of a Bible-based name.

Of course we want children to like their names, but surely a child raised on the Bible will appreciate a Bible name. I am grateful to my parents for giving me two biblical names.

Sincerely your brother,
Michael Timothy Drepaul, NY

Encouragement

Dear Bro. Don,

Loving greetings.

Your monthly printing of articles founded on God’s truth is a highlight of our mail deliveries. Of particular interest to me in the January “Tidings” were articles on Genesis, the exhortation and the Signs of the Times. In total, the magazine offers a wide spectrum of material to help us stand firm in the one faith…

At the beginning of each new year, particularly when living in the eleventh-hour period of Bible fulfillment, we become excited…We know not the day nor the hour but the season is right…May we all continue in growth — tall in our faith and straight in our walk until he comes.

With deep love in Christ.
Your sister,
Dolores Fisher, CA

Communal or Individual Cups

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings in the precious hope we share.

I hesitate to initiate again the concern of the one communal cup, but my conscience will not allow me to put aside what I have recently learned. .I had the opportunity to attend a monthly meeting of the local Dental Hygiene Society…When the speaker was introduced, and a brief synopsis of his resume given, I was all attention. (The speaker was Dr. Sanford F. Kuvin, Vice Chairman of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases. Dr. Kuvin has had wide exposure through both electronic and print media addressing the issue of mandatory HIV and hepatitis B testing. He has appeared on CBS ,NBC and CNN nightly news and talk shows as well as many other programs and his articles have appeared in the “New York Times,” “The Los Angeles Times” and numerous other publications.)

He relayed hair-raising facts about disease in our world…For example, tuberculosis, a disease which was thought completely eradicated, is again on the rise in the United States and world wide. AIDS and the HIV viruses are the locomotives behind the speed of TB’s increase. What is more frightening is that there are strains of the TB bacillus which are immune to any treatment. Anyone can catch TB in a vast array of manners (oral contamination being one way)…

I wrote to Dr. Kuvin regarding the cup…enclosed is his prompt reply…

As Bro. Walker commented, there is no scriptural law as to the form of drinking the wine.. It is a basic fact of all true believers that God is in complete control, but would you knowingly drive a car without brakes?…

With love in His name,

Connie Bonvechio, FL

(The letter from Dr. Kuvin.)

Dear Constance,

…In my opinion, in any group, the practice of drinking from a communal cup should be abandoned in today’s society based simply on good public health preventative policies. Hepatitis A (as well, on occasion, as hepatitis B,C,D and E) and also a host of other viruses…can be transmitted orally. Of course, the degree of infectiousness will depend on the quantity of the infectious agent being transmitted, the resistance and the health of the person sharing the vessel and other less certain factors such as the presence of known or unknown abrasions, or lesions in the mouth and gums. No case of HIV/AIDS has ever been documented by this method of transmission. However, HIV/AIDS patients now have at least 26 opportunistic diseases associated with their disease, and some are transmitted orally. It would be unwise to knowingly share communal cups with HIV/AIDS patients, or any other patients infected with contagious diseases, based on these facts.

Wine is certainly not a sterile medium…

In summary, I believe your group would be best served by discontinuing the use of communal cups for any purposes.

Sincerely,
Sanford F. Kuvin, MD

Some comments should be made regarding Dr. Kuvin’s reply.

We live in a very litigious society. If the doctor were to say anything other than what he has said, he would be exposed to a lawsuit if a member of the group came down with an infectious disease that could in any way be attributed to a common cup. While Chris­tadelphians would not do that, he doesn’t know it and has to protect himself.

Secondly, his warning is remarkably mild. Obviously, if anyone knows they are HIV positive or have TB, they should consider the rest of us and not take a common cup until all others have partaken. We do not share the cup with “HIV/AIDS patients.” Furthermore, no case of AIDS being transmitted in this manner “has ever been documented.”

While respecting the concerns of our sister and of others, we feel quite safe in our practice which we feel is more in harmony with the significance of fel­lowship than are individual cups. As has been said, however, we are free to choose the vessels in which we share the memorial wine, for the Lord has left no specific instructions on record.

Divorced Before Baptism

Dear Bro. Don,

Greetings and love in Christ.

…The letter enclosed is with respect to the situation concerning one who learned the Truth and was divorced before knowing the Truth. You will see that I believe God made provision for his status. He does so for all things. However, I agree with what you wrote, only with what I have just stated! believe is His decision. You may use the enclosed that was written for a brother and sister in Texas who asked my opinion…

Your brother in Christ,
Jack Brewis, ONT

Dear …

…We have nothing to do with judging those who are without. God has said that those without, He will judge. We are told to judge those within. We cannot, and must not, legislate for God…

Consider the words of Paul in I Timothy 1:12-13, “And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry: who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.”…

First, let us consider a person who has been divorced and remarried before learning the Truth. In preaching the gospel to all nations, it is inevitable that there will be some in this category. Knowing this, God has made provision for it…

Before being enlightened, the people in question were without God and hope in the world…Now they are “…a new creature (creation): old things are past away: behold, all things are become new.” The person is “born again” (II Cor. 5 :17 ; John 3 :3)…Their past is gone — everything. They are born again. Dare we do otherwise? If we believe that their past will keep them out of the kingdom, then why preach to them? We conclude by saying we rejoice with them, and fellowship in the hope of life eternal.

Dear Bro. Don:

Loving greetings in the bonds of the Truth.

In the January issue, a sister stated that one who is divorced before coming to a knowledge of the Truth can remarry after baptism. You agreed, but it seems to me that you have wrested the scriptures.

You quote Romans 4:15: “where no law is, there is no transgression” as proof of your stand — but you ignore the context. The verse begins by stating, “the law worketh wrath;” the passage continues: therefore the promise to Abraham and his seed came not by the law but by faith. God’s law existed for man since its inception in Eden. Paul had already written, “Jews and Gentile are all under sin” (Rom. 3:9). Mankind still remained under the code of righteousness established by God though there was no “law” set down specifically. With respect to Romans 5:13 “sin is not imputed where there is no law,” Bro. John Carter writes, “we must not infer that Paul means that during this time no law of God was known” (The Epistle to the Romans, pg. 62).

The covenant of marriage was instituted in the garden of Eden before sin and death entered the world. Further, Adam did not have father and mother” (Gen. 2:24), hence the covenant was designed for all men in every age (see “Tidings,” February, 1990, pg. 36) and it was to be for life.

With respect to I Corinthians 7, it is surprising that you write that Paul’s “permission” is not a commandment but only “advice.” Your inference is that we are free to ignore the “advice.” Was the apostle divinely inspired or wasn’t he? Further, you confuse Paul’s “permission” in verse 6 with what he “ordains” in verses 17-24. “Ordain” means “command” and is so translated seven times in the New Testament. This section is appropriately applicable to single, divorced converts to the Truth. The command inverse 17, “As the Lord has called every one so let him walk” is repeated inverses 20 and 24 . Perusal of several modern versions gives a clear translation of this phrase; for example the NIV reads, “each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him,” the Jerusalem Bible reads, “he should continue as he was when God’s call reached him.” This translation is confirmed by Vincent’s Word Studies in the N.T. If the passage is limited to slavery and circumcision, then the entire section has little bearing on our walk in this day and age. Paul’s instruction is certainly not “an argument from silence.” It shows anything but “the absence of a direct command.” It is “direct scriptural admonition” in clear-cut divine authority. The command is stated three times! How much clearer and how much more emphatic can the Apostle be?

The sister’s concerns regarding vows, etc. are covered explicitly in “Preparing for Marriage” (P gs. 42-43) by H.P. Mansfield. His exposition demonstrates that “baptism symbolizes death to the old way of life, but it does not wipe out the past” in the way the sister suggests.

Sincerely, your brother in Christ,
H.D. Bartholomew, BC