There is a wide-ranging belief amongst the Evangelical sects that it is the influence of the Holy Spirit directly in their lives that has influenced the change in their lives; to them, Jesus has “taken over”. One senses in discussion with such folk that the Scriptures are considered almost as secon­dary, as a text book about divine ideals, but not a force to change people for God.

However, when we look at the contextual evidence in the Epistles, it is abundantly clear that even in the days of open manifestation of divine power, the scriptures were turned to for guidance and also as the spiritual energy to keep brethren and sisters going. The sad feature of modern-day concepts of Holy Spirit guidance is the fact that the Bible is being not only neglected, but in some cases despised, a sort of second-division source of inspiration (after all, why do you need the Bible if you are being directed and guided by the Spirit!).

Let us, then, glance at a few references to guage the Apostlolic attitude to the Word of God:

“When ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe” (1 Thess.2:13).

The marvellous change in these one-time pagans was due to their response to the Word heard and also their allowing that word to work in them.

If it was “effectual” in their experience, should it not also be in ours? The striking point that Paul makes here is that we are only believers when the Word is working, and that with effect in our lives! All else is but a sham!

Another point which comes out of this verse and which leads us on to our next observation is that efforts is required on our part, namely, to allow ourselves to be influenced and opened up by that Word. So Paul says the mature members in Christ are those “Who by reason of use have their senses excerised to discern both good and evil” (Heb:5:14). In the context here he is reproving the brethren and sisters for not seeing the deeper things of the Word, even needing to be reminded of the first principles. Is not this a dan­ger with us? Surely the first principle references carry both exhortational as well as doctrinal principles (for example, one God is there such in our lives? See James 2:19).

We have to grow up spiritually, by the following process:

Birth – “Being Born again by the word of God” (1 Pet.1:23).

Growth – “Sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby” (1 Pet.2:2).

Maturity – “Meat to them that are of full age” (Heb.5:14).

Note in the three references given (please do look at the contexts!) it is the Word of God that brings the quickening and change. John writes that the young men were strong, for “the word of God abideth in you, and ye have overcome the wicked one” (1 John 2:14). The “wicked one” is the world (see verses 15 & 16) which constitutes the lusts of flesh, eyes and pride of life. Surely if these young men had overcome these traits by the Word of God and because of this are called “strong”, then it must be imperative that we also heed this same Word by reading, meditation and application. Further, it is folly for us not to encourage our young men (and women!) to turn to the Word of life. Social gatherings, more visual aids, etc. are no substitutes for the diligent application of our minds to the Word in the privacy of our own homes  There is too much substitute Bible study in our midst these days!

In Philippians ch.2 the balance of God’s working with us and our co­operation with Him is brought out beautifully: “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure” (2:12,13). How does God work in us? To the Thes­salonians it was through the Word. Is it any different for us than it was with these pilgrims of faith? Earlier in this same chapter Paul had talked of the mind which Christ had (from the Father, of course – v.5). The Master, through absorbing the mind of his Father, displayed perfection of character God worked through him. By allowing the mind of God (found in the Scriptures) to dictate decision-making and to mould our outlook and character (“work out your own salvation”), God’s will is being remembered, and in performance of that will, His “good pleasure” is revealed. Thus it is of God, and not of our own will.

There is, then, a process, and Jesus Christ beautifully presents it to us in the analogy of the vine (John ch.15):

“If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you (and how can that he,unless they are an integral part of our thinking), ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you” (v.7).

Note what is said:

  1. If we abide in him.
  2. and his words abide in us,
  3. prayer influenced and controlled by the Word is understood and accepted by the Father.

And the result of this intimate fellowship? Joy yes, real, truth-loving joy, for as the Master says, “these things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full (v.11). Let us not be fooled. Biblical joy arises from close fellowship with God through His Son by meditating upon His precious Word, and by humble prayer and diligent application. The joy that is allegedly missing from our Community (according to some who have gone to “other fields”) is perhaps missing because we have neglected the source of joy, the Word of life! (see Jer.15:16).

Let us, then, use the Scriptures on ourselves like the Priest used his knife to open up the animal and inspect its internals (see Heb.4:12); we also need to be opened up. Then, having our shortcomings revealed by the Scriptures, we turn to our great High Priest to find forgiveness of the sins revealed by his words (Heb.4:14,15). How wonderful! From a living Word to a living Saviour that’s surely “walking in light” (1 John 1:7).


Responses

Peter Heavyside responded in The Bible Student, Vol 13, No 1, March, 1982

  • Dear Geoff and Ray,

    Grace and peace from our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

    I would like to thank Bro. Brian Woodall for the forceful way in which he has reminded us of “The Power of the Scriptures” and our responsibility towards them, and would not wish what follows to detract from the positive aspects of his article.

    It is sometimes the practice in Christadelphian circles to suggest that the “Evangelical” doctrine of the Holy Spirit effectively renders the Bible useless. Not only this, but it is frequently claimed that this outcome is observable in the “Evangelical” neglect of the Bible.

    In my experience these statements are unjust, for “Evangelicals” (generally) have a profound respect for the authority of the Scriptures. Also, this respect is to be seen in the often diligent study they make of the Bible. In fact, it has been my sad experience over the past few years to witness the inability of brethren and sisters (some of whom, according to reputation, ought to have been able to rebuke the false teachers) to Scripturally answer the many (wrested) Scriptural points made by “Evangelicals”. In this respect, it is worthy of note that some Christadelphians have shown in practice the kind of attitude that Bro. Brian referred to in his opening paragraphs – not because of the peculiar “Evangelical” doctrine of the Holy Spirit, but due to some other ailment (dare I suggest “the deceitfulness of riches”?). I have met some “Evangelicals” who display, in principle and practice, the attitude to the Bible that Bro. Brian wrote about; but I believe these are maverick proponents of that body of belief. We should no more speak of these as though they were representative than we would wish the maverick members of our community to be thought representative by other denominations.

    It is true that “Evangelicals” speak of their need of the Holy Spirit in order to bring the “dead letter” of the Bible to life; in this, however, they are not advocating neglect of the Scriptures, but stating how the authority of the Bible is made known to man for obedience. They would also point to the coexistence in the 1st century of the Holy Spirit gifts and the Old Testament Scriptures, and remind us that this Holy Spirit operation did not render the Old Testament ineffective. Thus it is, if we state the things I mentioned earlier, we are doing an injustice to “Evangelicals”.

    All this does not mean that I believe either the evangelical doctrine of the Holy Spirit or that their doctrine is acceptable as a basis of fellowship. Rather, I am appealing that we (spiritually) attack their doctrine for what it is in reality:

    It introduces a second intercessor as being necessary for salvation, and so the proponents of it are found to be “false witnesses of God”.

    It charges the gospel as being insufficient to touch the heart of man and to bring him to repentance – so demeaning the work of Jesus.

    It is part of a body of doctrine which is cohesive and self-supporting (e.g. “substitutionary” sacrifice, the bondage of the will of man to the devil, the irresistible call to salvation, eternal security etc.).
    It shows a misunderstanding of what is meant when Paul writes about the “dead letter”.

    Moreover, I would like to point out that we (Christadelphians) glibly and sometimes unthinkingly speak of the Bible as being “the word of God”. Many “Evangelicals” say that the Bible never speaks of itself as “the word of God” but as “the Scriptures”, or “the law and the prophets” etc. They also state that, for example, when the Old Testament prophets spoke the word of God (which is Jesus) it ceased to be the word of God when written down.

    It takes some thought to sort out what is true and what is false in these statements; it also suggests the question – do we use unscriptural language to describe the Bible? I am quite convinced for myself that the Bible is the word of God (although I am sure we should be more ready to use Scriptural terms like those mentioned above). I ask the question in order to stimulate others to examine the issue in order not to be found in a false or vulnerable position when confronted by “Evangelicals”.

    Your brother with love in our Lord,

Geoff Walker responded in The Bible Student, Vol 13, No 1, March, 1982

  • The Evangelical churches are not organised as a cohesive body, but in general belong to other churches, many of these being C.of E.; but others to non-conformist bodies, and some to no other group. As such, there is a wide variation in practice, and even doctrine, among those claiming to be Evangeli­cal. We have met many of the type encountered by Bro. Peter, but others more like those referred to by Bro. Brian. However, Bro. Peter’s letter is a timely reminder to us to be fair in our comments about other churches.

    The point concerning our description of the Bible as the Word of God raises an interesting issue. What do others think?

Brian Woodall responded in The Bible Student, Vol 13, No 2, May, 1982

  • Dear Geoff and Ray,

    Greetings in Christ Jesus.

    My thanks to Bro. Peter Heavyside for presenting another side to the attitudes of “Evangelicals” to the Bible. My experiences have been based on a public discussion with a “rev” last year, plus discussion with fellow-students at College, particularly with those who belong to “Christian Union”. Nevertheless, it is important to have a balanced approach to those in other denominations.

    Regarding Peter’s observations on our Community’s description of the Bible as “the Word of God”, I offer the following verses (selected from many) for your readers’ thought.

    Matt. 22:29-32. The Master quotes Ex.3:6, introducing the quotation by these significant words, “…have ye not read that which was spoken unto you BY God, saying…”. Obviously what was written – the Old Testament passage here – is considered by Jesus to be “the Word of God”.

    Mark 7:6-13. Jesus quotes the words of Moses – “For Moses said” (v.10), and treats those words of “Scripture” as “the Word of God” (v.13).

    Romans 9:16,17. In these verses Paul makes no difference between the written word of the Old Testament and that which was spoken about at the time of the event as recorded in that “Scripture”. Note carefully what Paul writes: “So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy, for the scripture saith unto Pharaoh…”

    Romans 9:25. “As he saith also in O see…”. When a Christian in the First Century opened his Scripture at Hosea 2:23, God was speaking to him through that prophecy and thus must have been considered by Paul as “the Word of God”.

    Hebrews 2:11,12. In these two verses the emphasis is on the oneness of Jesus with those he came to save – they both are of “one” God. To justify this conclusion Paul quotes Ps.22:22, and treats the Quotation from the old testament as the Words of Jesus – “he (Jesus) is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying (and then he quotes Ps.22:22)!..”: Thus the Spirit in Paul equates the written word of Ps.22:22 with divine authority, as of course it is – the “Word made flesh”using his Father’s Word to show the oneness derived from that Word. I have some more passages before me, but I leave it to readers to do their homework (to start you off, please look at Heb.10:5-9 & John 10:34,35). As Peter brings out in his letter (a point which has been stressed in “The Bible Student” on several occasions), contextual study of the Bible is a “must” to determine the true meaning of a verse or even a word, particularly when we come to a word like “spirit”; using “spirit word” in every context is wrong – but how often this is done in our Community!

    Thank you, Peter, for stirring our minds to these things – “as iron sharpeneth iron…”.

    Your brother in the Hope of Israel,

    Brian Woodall