It was in January 1971 that a private circular was distributed, setting ‘out the need for, and the possibilities of, producing a magazine to pinpoint the faults and fantasies bedeviling the Australian brotherhood and to call for a return to the standards of truth and love in Christ. In March that year, and, coincidentally on the 100th anniversary of Dr. Thomas’ death, a score or so brethren met to soberly consider whether the idea of a magazine was viable. It was agreed that it was the only way the full facts of ecclesial chaos and threatening division could be put before all brethren and sisters. The result, two months later, was “The Believer”.
Probably no one could give a completely unbiassed resume of events since that time but the end result speaks for itself in noting the contrast between the attitudes and pronouncements of a certain contemporary magazine between 1970-2 and 1975-7. Undoubtedly Australian Ecclesial history would have followed a different course if the effort to produce this magazine had not been made.
The first ‘Editorial made the point, “Our object is to speak clearly and specifically on matters of general concern in the Australian brotherhood with a view to elevating us all to the standard of Christ”. This we plan to do; God willing, as long as the need exists. The Lord has been willing and we have been conscious of many blessings and acts of providence since we put our hands to the plough. But the purpose of looking back on the past six years has really been to look forward and to ask ‘Has this particular plough furrowed its course and finished its task?’
In asking this question, we are very conscious of the many, many letters we have had over the years from every State; letters which have expressed in earnest and thankful terminology the writers’ appreciation of our labours. It has always been our policy to refrain from publishing such letters, but have appreciated them nevertheless. Many, we feel sure, would like to see the magazine continue as a permanent publication until the Master returns. But publishing magazines is no easy matter and the time has come to weigh the pros and cons of this enterprise and what it might still accomplish.
Looking Forward
What needs still exist? The situation has certainly changed in six years. Facts have been made known and issues resolved or dissolved. Other issues have been baulked and the fires of discord are now warm embers. The potential for a re-kindling of the flames is there but are we being unrealistic if we hopefully feel that lessons have been learned and everyone is six years older and wiser?
New needs exist. In particular, the brotherhood is facing a crisis of identity as a body distinct from Christendom. The secular and religious atmosphere around us is changing so rapidly that the brotherhood is cautious, and uncertain. There are also new areas of doctrine and practice that have become sensitive. We have tried to address ourselves to consider some of these needs, but the scope is wide, suitable writers are hard to find, and our impact is limited.
Looking forward? In March this year the Committee meets to take a careful look at the future. If ,the magazine continues, what, should be its objectives? What objectives justify continuance? Any reader who feels moved to write to us on this matter should do so. Indeed, correspondence from readers will have a measure of influence on the Committee as they weigh up the issues in trying to decide the wisest course of action. Address your letters to the undersigned at P.O. Box 181, Toorak, Vic., 3142, to reach us by early March.
Fellowship with the Maker and Brethren